|
Inability to "justify" and challenge American law again
/ y2 Q+ Q [. \+ U u. }$ E3 R: M
2 C, s( W2 V$ l4 f* H/ E M0 OGuo Wengui, a wealthy Chinese businessman in exile in the United States, once again became a defendant in the United States. Her former female assistant, Ma Rui, recently filed a lawsuit in New York, United States, alleging that "Guo Wengui treated me like a sex slave" and raped him many times in the past few years. Therefore, he sued Guo Wengui and the company he controlled for illegal detention and intentional harm.7 The crime requires a total of 140 million US dollars in compensation for mental and sexual injuries.+ I2 B, i3 y$ D6 G
Guo Wengui responded on the Internet on the 12th, saying that Ma Rui's accusation against him was "a new rumor attack launched by the bandits out of fear." "Caixin.com" quoted the indictment report on the 12th that Ma Rui, a 28-year-old Chinese woman, filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New York County, New York. “Golden Springs (New York) Co., Ltd.” controlled seven counts of illegal detention and intentional injury, and required the court to rule that the defendant should compensate the plaintiff for the mental and sexual assault. Six counts were directed against Guo Wengui himself, and one count was directed against Jinquan Company).' j ]: W; y; ]4 ~
The indictment stated that Ma Rui was originally an employee of Guo Wengui's Chinese company and was required to travel to New York for a week after Guo Wengui fled the United States (early 2015). However, the plaintiff only returned to China nearly three years later, during which time he was repeatedly raped at Guo Wengui's New York and London residences.
1 k, k( F$ r3 w( \% d. ]It is said that the moment Ma Rui entered the United States, he almost completely lost his personal freedom. Guo Wengui confiscated Ma Rui's passport and controlled her communication channels with the outside world. Without permission, she could not use the phone or computer. For several years, Marie could only talk to her parents on the phone with permission, and could no longer contact her relatives or friends.4 c' N5 M4 c! K+ E
The indictment revealed that Guo Wengui's first violence against Ma Rui was in his New York residence, but Ma Rui broke free. Later, Guo Wengui gave Ma Rui a drink, then broke into Ma Rui's bedroom and raped him. Later, Guo Wengui raped Ma Rui again in his London residence. So far, the plaintiff suffered tremendous physical and psychological harm and began to suffer from depression, but he also strengthened his determination to flee. While in London, Ma Rui finally found the opportunity to leave Guo Wengui's residence, enter the Chinese Embassy in the UK, and then return to China.
$ L9 L$ _$ U+ F- @5 Z' VRecently, a recording of a conversation between Ma Rui and Guo Wengui, the female head of the London company, Wang Yanping, has also been circulating on the Internet. In the recording, Ma Rui clearly explained the process of his rape by Guo Wengui, including the deprivation of his virgin body by Guo Wengui and repeated rapes on Guo Wengui's yacht. Ma Rui emphasized that she fought fiercely every time she was raped, but she couldn't stop it. She once asked Guo Wengui that he was about the same age as his daughter, why did she treat her like this? Guo Ze said: "Don't think so much." Ma Rui hoped that Wang Yanping could help her. Wang Yanping asked Ma Rui not to call the police, and said that according to Guo Wengui's instructions, Ma Rui's passport had been cut.; L( H" }& [5 S5 \0 Y- G
Guo Wengui took the initiative to mention on his Twitter yesterday that the US media would report that Ma Rui accused him of rape, but called it "a new rumor attack by the bandits out of fear." But Guo Wengui had insulted Huang in the video. Many women such as Yan, Fan Bingbing, Xu Qing, Dong Qing, Wang Fang, Yang Lan, etc., are all heinous in their absurdity, vulgar language, and malicious content. However, apart from individual declarations by the women involved, no one took legal measures. Guo Wengui had to make an inch of it, ignoring the dignity of others again and again, and blatantly challenged American laws. |
|