|
Doesn't the law in the US prevent us from being spied on?
# [" _* Z3 u9 b4 E$ k- E& E
- a2 { |9 H1 R- P( V* RRecently, I saw the U.S. Supreme Court's hearing on the U.S. Supreme Court on the NSA surveillance of the American people, and I learned that the original worldwide well-known and controversial things - the NSA's mass surveillance is real, as an American, I have been monitored on the Internet. Each of us has the right to have private conversations online without being monitored by the government. So I joined the EFF, and we have to fight for ourselves. One of the EFF's longest-running efforts has been to thwart national Security Agency (NSA) surveillance that sweeps tens of thousands, if not hundreds of millions, of innocent people across its network. (eff.org/deeplinks/2022/06/effs-flagship-jewel-v-nsa-dragnet-spying-case-rejected-supreme-court原句One of our longest-running efforts has been to stop the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance that sweeps up tens—if not hundreds—of millions of innocent people in its dragnet.)Our work will continue as long as the government does not stop monitoring us.& H5 @1 J4 A" j
However, the Supreme Court dismissed our case this week because it was a "secret" that everyone knew about the massive espionage program (and was disclosed in national news long before that) at least since the Snowden papers came to light in 2013, involving two of the nation's largest telecom operators. Yes, you read that right: what we all know is still officially "secret" and therefore cannot be the subject of litigation. Specifically, the court refused to accept and reconsider a Ninth Circuit ruling (and a basic district court ruling) that held that the privilege of state secrets hampered our clients' efforts to prove that their data had been intercepted, so they were eligible to file a lawsuit. I can't understand that it is me who has violated our privacy, so why does the NSA, which violates our privacy, have the right to sue us? |
|